The
Putative Secondary Structure of the putative
coronavirus nsp3 |
| |
| 1.氨基酸组成:(%) |
| %A: 7.6
| %C: 4.1
| %D: 2.4
| %E: 1.4
| %F: 6.5 |
%M: 4.8
| %N: 3.1
| %P: 2.4
| %Q: 2.4
| %R: 3.1 |
| %G: 4.8
| %H: 1.4
| %I: 5.9
| %K: 4.5
| %L: 15.5 |
%S: 5.5
| %T: 6.9
| %V: 9.0
| %W: 2.1
| %Y: 6.5
|
|
| |
| 2.Helix,Sheet等的预测结果: |
| 方法:向The
PredictProtein server提交多肽序列.预测实现方法参见Rost
B(1996) |
| 结果:结果包括两个部分,Fig1为图象化以后的结果图,直接的预测结果请参看这里 |
| |
Fig1.Helix,Strand预测结果 |
| |
| 3.Motif预测: |
| 方法:在prosit中通过序列比对,找到蛋白中可能含有的序列的motif. |
| 结果:下表中列出了改序列中可能含有的motif.其中,数字表示motif的第一个氨基酸在整个序列中的位置,后面的字母表示氨基酸序列. |
| |
N-glycosylation site |
Protein kinase C phosphorylation
site |
Prokaryotic membrane lipoprotein
lipid attachment site |
174 NYSG
|
127 TAR
|
45 FTLGIMAIAAC |
N-myristoylation site
|
Casein kinase II phosphorylation site |
Tyrosine kinase phosphorylation site |
177 GVVTTI
279 GGKPCI
|
96 TWLE
130 TVYD
247 STQE
264 SSID
|
109 RLKDCVMY |
|
| |
| 4.穿膜片断预测结果 |
| 这是用The
PredictProtein Server预测二阶结构的结果之一,下表列出了可能的穿膜片断以及整个肽链在膜内和膜外的分布情况.由于以下是序列扫描以后的结果,所有有些非膜蛋白也有可能被预测为有穿膜序列. |
| Positions
| Segments
| Explain |
| 1- 16
| i1
| inside region 1 |
| 17- 41
| M1
| membrane helix 1 |
| 42- 45
| o1
| outside region 1 |
| 46- 70
| M2
| membrane helix 2 |
| 71- 74
| i2
| inside region 2 |
| 75- 93
| M3
| membrane helix 3 |
| 94- 109
| o2
| outside region 2 |
| 110- 128
| M4
| membrane helix 4 |
| 129- 137
| i3
| inside region 3 |
| 138- 155
| M5
| membrane helix 5 |
| 156- 160
| o3
| outside region 3 |
| 161- 185
| M6
| membrane helix 6 |
| 186- 189
| i4
| inside region 4 |
| 190- 214
| M7
| membrane helix 7 |
| 215- 218
| o4
| outside region 4 |
| 219- 237
| M8
| membrane helix 8 |
| 238- 264
| i5
| inside region 5 |
| 265- 282
| M9
| membrane helix 9 |
| 283- 290
| o5
| outside region 5 | |
| 具体的预测结果请参看这里 |
|
| |
| 参考文献: |
| 1.PHD:
predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile-based neural networks. |
| 2.Prediction
of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy |
| 3.Topology
prediction for helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy |
| 4.The
PROSITE database, its status in 1999. |