Toronto hospital workers apparently caught the SARS virus despite
intense precautions because they were exposed to an invisible mist of
droplets containing the microbe while helping a very sick patient breathe,
experts reported yesterday.
An investigation into a case in which nine health care workers were
infected by a single patient concluded that the most likely cause was a
virus-laden aerosol that the patient coughed out during a procedure to
insert a breathing tube down his throat, the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention in Atlanta reported.
The procedure caused the very sick 54-year-old patient to cough
heavily, producing an aerosol containing heavy concentrations of virus
that enveloped the health care workers close to him, the CDC said. That
could explain how the health care workers became infected even though they
were taking every recommended precaution, including wearing protective
gowns, gloves and masks.
The findings could also explain similar baffling incidents elsewhere in
Toronto and in Hong Kong in which hospital workers became infected with
severe acute respiratory syndrome even though they were being very careful
to protect themselves. The investigation also did find, however, that some
workers did not fully understand the safest way to remove their protective
equipment, and in some cases their masks did not fit snugly.
"We are still learning about what's working and what's not working for
infection control," Julie L. Gerberding, director of the CDC, said in a
telephone briefing. "These experiences in Canada have taught us some
lessons that we will transmit here in the United States."
The CDC also removed Vietnam from its list of countries that travelers
should avoid, because no new cases have been reported there for more than
30 days. In addition, the agency said the number of probable SARS cases in
the United States remains at 64, with only one new case reported so far
this month.
"This indicates that international travel advisories and other steps
being taken in countries where SARS has been reported are working,"
Gerberding said.
Meanwhile, World Health Organization researchers in Hong Kong reported
that intensive testing found no more evidence of the virus at the Amoy
Gardens apartment tower, where hundreds of residents were infected, or in
the Metropole Hotel, where the outbreak began in Hong Kong. The findings
indicate that contaminated buildings can be effectively cleaned and safely
inhabited.
It is still unclear why the virus spread so readily in the Metropole,
but the WHO team confirmed local health officials' conclusion that the
virus probably spread through the apartment building in part through leaky
plumbing, said Klaus Stohr, WHO's top SARS scientist.
In yet another finding, scientists in Canada said a series of
experiments has shown that pigs and chickens cannot be infected with the
SARS virus. That indicates the animals were probably not the original
source of the virus and would not provide a "reservoir" in which the virus
could hide and reemerge if public health measures succeed in stamping out
the epidemic in humans, Stohr said.
Chickens and pigs were considered the most likely animals to play a
role in the epidemic. Both species can be infected by related viruses, and
people live in close proximity to both species in southern China, where
the epidemic began.
"This is an important finding," Stohr said. "We were all speculating
about animal reservoirs. These tests show that these animals, pigs and
chickens, do not appear to play a role in any stage of the evolution of
this virus. The virus does not like them. That makes them a very
inefficient host for the virus."
Researchers are testing other species, such as cattle, as they continue
to hunt for animals that can be infected, Stohr said.
Also yesterday, WHO recommended that people who have had SARS or may
have been exposed to it be barred temporarily from donating organs or
blood. Although there is no evidence anyone has become infected this way,
WHO took the step as a precaution. The U.S. and Canadian governments have
issued similar recommendations.
Under WHO's guidelines, people with probable SARS cases should not
donate blood for three months after they recover, while those with
suspected cases should not donate for a month after recovering.
Anyone who has either recently returned from an area where the virus is
spreading, or who develops symptoms after having had close contact with a
patient, should not donate blood for three weeks after their return or
their symptoms subside.
Correspondent Ellen Nakashima contributed to this report from Hong
Kong.