Yahoo! News   Fri, Jul 25, 2003
Science - Reuters
Don't Base Drug Policy on Race, Geneticists Say
Thu Jul 24, 2:04 PM ET

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Health officials may be wrong in attempts to match health care and especially drugs with race, because genetically there is no such thing, gene experts said on Thursday.

It would be better to go straight to a more personalized approach to medicine, gene pioneer Craig Venter and colleague Susanne Haga said.

"It is what I call race-based medicine," Venter said in a telephone interview.

They praised the U.S. Food And Drug Administration (news - web sites) for trying to formulate guidance that would take genetics into account when testing drugs, but said using simple notions of race was not the way to go.

"They should be applauded for trying to go beyond white males," Venter, who led one team that sequenced the human genome (news - web sites), said in a telephone interview.

"But our argument is they are not going far enough in that direction."

Venter, who now heads the nonprofit Center for the Advancement of Genomics in Rockville, Maryland, has long argued that genetics do not support social and cultural ideas of race.

Several teams of scientists have found that there are more genetic differences among Africans from different regions, for example, than there are between Africans and Europeans.

In January the FDA issued draft guidance to industry suggesting that official Office of Management and Budget classifications for race and ethnicity be used in gathering information for clinical trials.

GENES CAN AFFECT DRUGS

It noted that different groups respond differently to medical products.

"For example in the United States, whites are more likely than persons of Asian and African heritage to have abnormally low levels of an important enzyme (CYPD2D6) that metabolizes drugs belonging to a variety of therapeutic areas, such as antidepressants, antipsychotics and beta blockers," the FDA says in the draft guidance.

"Other studies have shown that blacks respond poorly to several classes of antihypertensive (high blood pressure) agents."

But Venter said this does not mean that all blacks will respond poorly to such drugs, or even most blacks. The races are highly mixed in the United States.

"Geographical origin (ancestry) appears to be more relevant than a person's self-identified race," Venter wrote in a commentary in Friday's issue of the journal Science.

The FDA agrees that many of the differences can be accounted for by cultural issues and habits, such as diet, but wants racial factors studied so the differences can be better understood.

Venter and Haga agree but say self-reported race is irrelevant. "It would be inaccurate to check off any one box on the U.S. census if you African-American or Caucasian because to some degree we all admixed," Haga said in a telephone interview.

"Six million people have actually changed, between censuses, their racial classification, so we are using social constructs to try and define very important scientific issues," Venter added.

So in theory, guidelines could eventually be issued saying black people should get one drug and whites another. But if a black patient lacks the specific genetic makeup lying behind such theory, he or she might get the wrong drug.

"If there is a genetic variable behind a predisposition to disease among a population, it doesn't mean all those in the population are going to have the disease," Haga said.

Better to design individual genetic tests to use on a patient-by-patient basis, they said.


Copyright © 2003 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2003 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Questions or Comments
Privacy Policy -Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Ad Feedback