Pharmacy data reveals impact of smoking ban
Bioterror surveillance throws up
health intelligence.
28 October 2003
HELEN
PEARSON
 |
Sales peaks of patches
only last for a couple
of weeks. |
| © Corbis |
|
|
Tax hikes and a ban on public smoking prompted New
Yorkers to try quitting the habit, public-health officials
revealed last week. The finding is part of intelligence
churned out by the health-surveillance systems springing
up across the United States.
Researchers are increasingly tracking doctors' visits,
pharmacy sales, absentee rates and even death certificates,
hoping to pick up unusual spikes in activity. These
might be early warning signs of a bioterror attack or
spreading foreign disease, they reason.
The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,
for example, receives daily streams of data about hospital
diagnoses and drugstore purchases. Health official Kristi
Metzger and colleagues examined how sales of nicotine
patches and pills from more than 100 outlets in New
York changed over the past two years.
Sales of nicotine-replacement therapies shot up with
the advent of virtuous New Year's resolutions, Metzger
told the 2003 National Syndromic Surveillance Conference
in New York last week. A small recurring peak suggests
that "people may be more likely to quit on Mondays",
she added.
A July 2002 hike in the New York state tax on cigarettes,
from 8 cents to $1.50 per pack, also sent sales of nicotine
therapies soaring. So too did the Smoke-Free Air Act,
which came into force on 30 March this year and bans
smoking in all indoor New York workplaces, including
bars and restaurants. But people's resolve rapidly crumbled:
the sales boosts lasted only a week or two.
Such data might one day inform public-health policy,
Metzger suggested. For example, it could have given
health officials a heads-up after August's East Coast
blackout. Retrospectively, officials reported a spike
in people visiting hospitals with diarrhoea brought
on by spoiled food.
Watchful eye
Prompted by the US anthrax attacks of October 2001,
most of the new surveillance systems are designed to
pick up early warning signs of a bioterror attack, such
as a hike in fevers or rashes. They use sophisticated
algorithms to filter computerized health data for unusual
peaks.
But the systems are untested as yet by bioterror agents
- so researchers are teasing other information from
them. "These data have all sorts of uses," says Julie
Pavlin, an expert in preventive medicine at the Walter
Reed Army Institute of Research in Silver Spring, Maryland.
|
We're realising these
data have all sorts
of uses
|
|
Julie Pavlin
Walter Reed
Army Institute
|
|
|
Pavlin told the New York meeting of her efforts to
mine doctors' data on families of those in the military.
She probed computer codes that describe patients' main
diagnoses after a clinic visit, as well as prescription
logs. This information has been collated since 1997,
partly as a means of budgeting, Pavlin explained.
Pavlin saw an anticipated peak in patient numbers visiting
doctors with depression or anxiety around the time that
US forces invaded Iraq in March. Such information might
warn doctors to set up support networks or classes in
the future, Pavlin suggested. "They can help track the
mental health of the community," she added.
|