Pathophysiology and diagnosis of ischemic chest pain

Philip J Podrid, MD
Jun 22, 1999

Patients presenting with chest pain often undergo a thorough evaluation to assess the possible presence of anginal pain due to coronary ischemia. A careful history and physical examination is critical to accurately establish the diagnosis of angina pectoris and to exclude other causes of chest pain, such as musculoskeletal problems. (See "Enhancing the precision for identification of acute coronary ischemia in the emergency department").

A clinical diagnosis of angina pectoris has a 90 percent predictive accuracy for the presence of coronary disease, although based on Bayesian principles, this does depend upon the prevalence of coronary disease in the population, ie, men versus women, young versus old, etc [1,2]. This is equal to or perhaps greater than the diagnostic accuracy of exercise testing [3,4]. This card will review the underlying pathophysiology of angina and the characteristic clinical features of this disorder.

This card will review the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and differential diagnosis of ischemic chest pain. The uses of electrocardiography, blood tests, and echocardiography in the acute evaluation of this complaint are discussed separately. (See "Electrocardiogram in myocardial ischemia and infarction", see "Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction with biomarkers of cardiac injury-I", and see "Transthoracic echocardiography for the evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department").

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF ANGINA ! Angina is caused by myocardial ischemia which occurs whenever myocardial oxygen demand exceeds oxygen supply. An understanding of the pathophysiology of angina first requires a brief review of the determinants of oxygen demand and supply.

Myocardial oxygen demand ! There are four major factors that determine myocardial work and therefore myocardial oxygen demand:

  •  Heart rate
  •  Systolic blood pressure (the clinical marker of afterload)
  •  Myocardial wall tension or stress (the product of ventricular end-diastolic volume or preload and myocardial muscle mass)
  •  Myocardial contractility

Clinical conditions associated with an increase in oxygen demand must affect one or more of these parameters. Examples include increased catecholamines, as with vigorous exertion or mental stress [5], tachycardia of any etiology, hypertension, and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Myocardial oxygen demands are estimated clinically by the multiplication product (also called the double product) of the heart rate and the systolic blood pressure. Individuals reproducibly experience angina during exercise testing when asked to exceed a well defined angina threshold or absolute double product value.

Myocardial oxygen supply ! The major determinants of oxygen supply are the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood, which is determined by oxygen tension and hemoglobin level; the degree of oxygen unloading from hemoglobin to the tissues, which is related to 2,3 diphosphoglycerate levels; and the coronary artery blood flow, which is influenced by the following factors:

  •  Coronary artery diameter and vessel tone (resistance) [6,7]
  •  Collateral flow
  •  Perfusion pressure, which is determined by the pressure gradients from the aorta to the coronary artery to the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (since flow is from epicardium to endocardium).
  •  Heart rate and diastolic period (since coronary artery flow occurs primarily during diastole).

Any clinical setting or pathologic situation which results in a reduction in myocardial oxygen supply can cause ischemia. The most frequent cause is coronary atherosclerosis, but others include coronary artery vasospasm, fibrosis, and embolism. In addition, stimulation of the esophagus by acid can cause coronary artery vasoconstriction and a reduction in coronary blood flow via a neural cardioesophageal reflex [8].

Angina can also occur after eating. Postprandial angina results from a redistribution of blood flow, away from territories supplied by severely stenosed coronary arteries and to those supplied by less diseased or normal arteries [9]. This may be due to sympathetic activation from food ingestion and norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction in diseased vessels.

HISTORY ! The patient with angina often has a fairly typical history. However, there is marked heterogeneity of responses to stimuli that can produce ischemia such as mental stress, exercise, and other factors of daily life [10]. Nevertheless, the following features of the chest pain should be addressed [11,12]:

  •  Quality of the chest pain ! Angina is often characterized more as a discomfort than pain, and may be difficult to describe. Terms frequently used by patients include squeezing, tightness, pressure, constriction, strangling, burning, heart burn, fullness in the chest, band-like sensation, knot in the center of the chest, lump in throat, ache, heavy weight on chest (elephant sitting on chest), like a bra too tight, and toothache (when there is radiation to the lower jaw). In some cases, the patient cannot qualify the nature of the discomfort, but places his or her fist in the center of the chest, known as the "Levine sign."

Angina is typically gradual in onset as the intensity of the discomfort increases over several minutes. In contrast, noncardiac pain is often of greatest intensity at its onset.

Angina is a constant discomfort which does not change with respiration or position. It is generally not described as sharp, dull-aching, knife-like, stabbing, or pins and needles-like.

  •  Location ! Angina is not felt in one specific spot, but rather is a diffuse discomfort that may be difficult to localize. The patient often indicates the entire chest, rather than a specific area, when asked where the discomfort is felt.

  •  Radiation ! Angina often radiates to other parts of the body including the upper abdomen (epigastric), shoulders, arms (upper and forearm), wrist, fingers, neck and throat, lower jaw and teeth (but not upper jaw), and rarely to the back (specifically the interscapular region) [12,13].

  •  Associated symptoms ! Angina is often associated with other symptoms. The most common is shortness of breath, which may reflect mild pulmonary congestion resulting from ischemia-mediated diastolic dysfunction [13,14]. Other symptoms may include belching, nausea, indigestion, diaphoresis, dizziness, lightheadedness, clamminess, and fatigue.

  •  Provoking factors ! Angina is often elicited by activities and situations which increase myocardial oxygen demand, including physical activity, cold, emotional stress, sexual intercourse, meals, or lying down [15,16,17]. It has been strongly recommended that patients also be questioned about cocaine use [18,19,20]. As an example, one study of 3946 patients with a acute myocardial infarction found that one percent had used cocaine within the prior year; the risk of a myocardial infarction was increased 23.7 times over baseline in the 60 minutes after cocaine use [21].

  •  Timing ! Angina occurs more commonly in the morning due to a morning diurnal increase in sympathetic tone. Enhanced sympathetic activity raises heart rate, blood pressure, vessel tone and resistance (resulting in a reduced vessel diameter which causes any fixed lesion to be more occlusive), and platelet aggregability.

  •  Duration of symptoms ! Angina generally lasts for two to five minutes. It is not a fleeting discomfort, that lasts only for a few seconds or less than a minute, and it generally does not last for 20 to 30 minutes, unless the patient is experiencing an acute myocardial infarction.

  •  Relief of discomfort ! Factors that reduce oxygen demand or increase oxygen supply will result in relief of angina. These include cessation of activity (the patient generally has the feeling that he needs to stop what he is doing), use of nitroglycerin, sitting up (which reduces venous return and preload), Valsalva maneuver, and carotid sinus pressure [22,23].

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION ! Ischemia can produce myocardial function abnormalities which may result in the following findings on physical examination:

  •  Increase in heart rate ! Ischemia can raise the heart rate which may occur even if the patient is receiving a beta blocker or calcium channel blocker. The increase in heart rate is induced by reflex sympathetic nervous system activation as a response to discomfort.

Stimulation of a chemoreceptor located in the area of the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery results in activation of the sympathetic nervous system. This receptor binds vasoactive amines, in particular serotonin, which is found in high levels in platelets and is released during platelet aggregation. Platelets are known to spontaneously aggregate at the site of an atheroma, causing further obstruction to blood flow and, therefore, additional ischemia.

  •  Elevation in blood pressure ! Ischemia often causes a hypertensive response. The elevation in blood pressure is induced by both sympathetic activation in response and stimulation of the LAD chemoreceptor.

  •  New heart sounds ! Ischemia-induced myocardial dysfunction can lead to changes in the normal heart sounds. The second heart sound may become paradoxically split due to delayed relaxation of the left ventricular myocardium and delayed closure of the aortic valve. There may also be a third or fourth heart sound. These changes are typically transient and disappear upon resolution of ischemia.

  •  New murmurs ! Impaired myocardial function may result in a new mitral regurgitation murmur (which may be due in part to transient papillary muscle dysfunction) or changes in preexisting murmurs. (See "Auscultation of cardiac murmurs-I").

  •  Precordial movements ! Palpation of the chest wall may reveal abnormal pulsations which correlate with transient left ventricular dysfunction. An area of dyskinesis may develop, especially at the apex of the left ventricle. This abnormal movement reflects disease of the LAD. (See "Examination of the precordial pulsation")

Palpation of the left anterior chest wall at the anterior axillary line may reveal an abnormal tapping in systole, which reflects the presence of an area of dyskinetic contraction or aneurysm. Transient right ventricular dysfunction may also manifest as a transient right ventricular heave or sternal pulsation.

EVALUATION OF CHEST PAIN IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ! The first step in the evaluation of patients with chest pain is the exclusion of coronary ischemia as the cause. Despite the availability of a number of tests, the Working Group on Evaluation of Technologies for Identifying Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Room has concluded that, with the exception of the 12-lead ECG, which should be considered a standard of care, there is no additional testing that can be broadly applied for general use [24].

Before embarking upon any algorithm or diagnostic pathway, the responsible health care provider (physician or trained other health care provider), must take the totality of evidence and place the individual in one of four classifications [25]:

  •  Definite ACI ! Substernal discomfort precipitated by exertion, with a typical radiation to the shoulder, jaw or inner aspect of the arm relieved by rest or nitroglycerin in less than 10 minutes

  •  Probable ACI ! Has most of the features of definite angina but may not be entirely typical in some aspects

  •  Probably not ACI ! Defined as an atypical overall pattern of chest pain that does not fit the description of definite angina

  •  Definitely not ACI ! A questionable history of chest pain that is unrelated to activity, appears to be clearly of noncardiac origin and is not relieved by nitroglycerin

This proposed schema is an adaptation of the characterization of angina that was used so successfully in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) more than 20 years ago [25]. Of 18,844 men who were entered into the CASS Registry following coronary angiography, 46 percent were classified as having definite angina, 29 percent probable angina, 9 percent probably not angina, and 2 percent definitely not angina. For the 6,097 women enrolled, the comparable numbers were 28, 35, 25, and 4 percent, respectively [25]. Combining all patients with probably not and definitely not angina as nonischemic pain was subsequently shown to have a powerful discriminatory function in identifying those individuals without angiographically proven coronary disease and a negative stress test [26]. (See "Evaluation of suspected acute coronary ischemia in the emergency department").

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS ! There are a number of conditions which can produce chest pain that may be mimic or be confused with angina pectoris (show table 2A-2B).

  •  Other cardiac disorders ! Pericarditis, myocarditis, atrial arrhythmias, pulmonary hypertension, mitral valve prolapse. (See "Evaluation and management of acute pericarditis").

  •  Intrathoracic diseases ! Pulmonary embolism, pleuritis, mediastinitis, pneumonia.

  •  Esophageal disorders ! Spasm, reflux, esophagitis, esophageal motility disorders [8,27,28]. (See "Chest pain of esophageal origin").

  •  Gastrointestinal diseases ! Gallbladder disease (cholecystitis, cholelithiasis), gastritis, peptic and duodenal ulcer, distension of colon (splenic flexure), pancreatitis [29].

  •  Musculoskeletal conditions ! Costochondritis, Tietze's syndrome, radiculopathy, chest wall trauma, herpes zoster and postherpetic syndrome, rib fracture, rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis), fibromyalgia [30]. (See "Major causes of musculoskeletal chest pain").

  •  Functional ! Da Costa's syndrome (hyperkinetic heart syndrome) [31,32].

The characteristics of the chest pain in these disorders, including location, duration, and precipitating and relieving factors, are summarized in Table 2 (show table 2A-2B). Practice guidelines have identified the following characteristics of nonischemic chest discomfort [18]:

  •  Pleuritic pain sharp or knife-like pain related to respiratory movements or cough
  •  Primary or sole location in the mild or lower abdominal region
  •  Any discomfort localized with one finger
  •  Any discomfort reproduced by movement or palpation
  •  Constant pain lasting for days
  •  Fleeting pains lasting for a few seconds or less
  •  Pain radiating in to the lower extremities or above the mandible

1. Diamond, GA, Forrester, JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:1350.
2. Cohn, PF, Harris, P, Barry, WH, et al. Prognostic importance of anginal symptoms in angiographically defined coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1981; 47:233.
3. Goldman, L, Cook, EF, Mitchell, N, et al. Incremental value of the exercise test for diagnosing the presence or absence of coronary artery disease. Circulation 1982; 66:945.
4. Wilson, RF, Marcus. MI, Christiansen, BV, et al. Accuracy of exercise electrocardiography in detecting physiologically significant coronary arterial lesions. Circulation 1991; 83:412.
5. Goldberg, AD, Becker, LC, Bonsall R, et al. Ischemic, hemodynamic, and neurohormonal responses to mental and exercise stress. Experience from the Psychophysiological Investigations of Myocardial Ischemia Study (PIMI). Circulation 1996; 94:2402.
6. Hillis, LD, Braunwald, E. Coronary artery spasm. N Engl J Med 1978; 299:695.
7. Ganz, P, Abben, RP, Barry, WH. Dynamic variations in resistance of coronary arterial narrowings in angina pectoris at rest. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59:66.
8. Chauhan, A, Mullins, PA, Petch, MC, et al. Cardioesophageal reflex: A mechanism for "linked angina" in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27:1621.
9. Baliga, RR, Rosen, SD, Camici, PG, et al. Regional myocardial blood flow redistribution as a cause of postprandial angina pectoris. Circulation 1998; 97:1144.
10. Sheps, DS, McMahon, RP, Pepine, CJ, et al. Heterogeneity among cardiac ischemic and anginal responses to exercise, mental stress, and daily life. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81:1.
11. Sampson, JJ, Cheitlin, MD. Pathophysiology and differential diagnosis of cardiac pain. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1971; 13:507.
12. Constant, J. The clinical diagnosis of nonanginal chest pain: the differentiation of angina from nonanginal chest pain by history. Clin Cardiol 1983; 6:11.
13. Christie, LG, Conti, CR. Systematic approach to evaluation of angina-like chest pain: Pathophysiology and clinical testing with emphasis on objective documentation of myocardial ischemia. Am Heart J 1981; 102:897.
14. Cook, DG, Shaper, AG. Breathlessness, angina pectoris and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:921.
15. Juneau, M, Johnstone, M, Dempsey, E, et al. Exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in a cold environment. Effect of antianginal medications. Circulation 1989; 79:1015.
16. Kearney, MT, Charlesworth, A, Cowley, AJ, et al. William Heberden revisited: Postprandial angina-interval between food and exercise and meal consumption are important determinants of time to onset of ischemia and maximal exercise tolerance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:302.
17. Schiffer, F, Hartley, LH, Schulman, CL, et al. Evidence for emotionally induced coronary arterial spasm in patients with angina pectoris. Br Heart J 1980; 44:62.
18. Braunwald, E, Mark, DB, Jones, RH, et al. Unstable Angina: Diagnosis and Management. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 10 (amended) AHCPR Publication No. 94-0602, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, May 1994.
19. American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy for the initial approach to adults presenting with a chief complaint of chest pain, with no history of trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25:274.
20. Hollander, JE, Brooks, DE, Valentine, SM. Assessment of cocaine use in patients with chest pain syndromes. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:62.
21. Mittleman, MA, Mintzer, D, Maclure, M, et al. Triggering of myocardial infarction by cocaine. Circulation 1999; 99:2737.
22. Horowitz, LD, Herman, MV, Gorlin, R. Clinical response to nitroglycerin as a diagnostic test for coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1972; 29:149.
23. Levine, SA. Carotid sinus massage: A new diagnostic test for angina pectoris. JAMA 1962; 182:1332.
24. An evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the Emergency Department: A report from the National Heart Attack Alert Program (NHAAP) Coordinating Committee. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 29:163.
25. CASS Investigators. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Coronary Artery Study. A multicenter comparison of the effects of randomized medical and surgical treatments of mildly symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease and a registry of consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography. Circulation 1981; 63(Suppl I):I-81.
26. Weiner, DA, Ryan, TJ, McCabe, CH, et al. Correlations among history of angina, ST segment response and prevalence of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). N Engl J Med 1979; 301:230.
27. Davies, HA, Jones, DB, Rhodes, J, et al. Anginal-like esophageal pain: Differentiation from cardiac pain by history. J Clin Gastroenterol 1985; 7:477.
28. Conte, MR, Orzan, F, Magnacca, M, et al. Atypical chest pain: Coronary or esophageal disease? Int J Cardiol 1986; 13:135.
29. Hargrove, MD. Gallbaldder disease and chest pain. Cardiovasc Dis Chest Pain 1987; 2:3.
30. Epstein, SE, Gerber, LH, Borer, JS. Chest wall syndrome: A common cause of unexpected cardiac pain. JAMA 1979; 24:2793.
31. Bass, C, Chambers, JB, Kiff, P, et al. Panic anxiety and hyperventilation in patients with chest pain. A controlled study. Q J Med 1988; 69:949.
32. Beitman, BD, Basha, I, Flaker, G, et al. Atypical or nonanginal chest pain. Panic disorder or coronary artery disease? Arch Intern Med 1987; 147:1548.